The Arab peoples are signifying to us that resistance and revolt are with us once again, and that history is moving beyond History. They are doing it, as is appropriate, with all the fortune and misfortune that it involves. At the very least they have sent an irreversible signal whose effects we can expect to see across Africa and in the odious perpetuation of the drama on Canaan’s ancient land. In one of the places where we least expected this revolt to occur, a leader of the gang (officially, of the State) crushes it, ready to liquidate whoever necessary of his supposed people.
Meanwhile, other States strike at their own rebels quite forcefully, sometimes with the help of a powerful Arab neighbour. Benghazi insurgents are asking for help: this is not simple, entailing clear risks, both practical and political. Political responsibility means weighing up and dealing with such circumstances. Is this the time to invoke in pell-mell fashion the collateral risks and suspicion of (more or less) hidden interests, the principles of non-interference and the heavy guilt of a “West” that may, one wonders, include Libya itself, or Saudi Arabia or Syria, not to mention China and Russia.
It is fine for the beautiful souls of the left and the sophisticated operators on the right to sigh or protest; whether in European or in Arab countries: one must know which world we are in. We are no longer just simply in the world of Western arrogance, self-confidence and imperialism. Oh! It is not that the poor old “West” has cleaned up its act: it is simply in the process of melting in the fusion that begets another world, without sunrise or sunset, a world where it is day and night everywhere at the same time and where it is necessary to reinvent the act of living together and, before all else, the act of living itself.
So, yes, it is necessary to keep a close eye on the strikes that are aimed at undermining the vile assassin of the people; sure, it is necessary to strike – him, of course, not the people. We can no longer, with one hand, invoke the sovereignty that, with the other hand, we empty of substance and legitimacy through all the interconnections – the best and worst – of the globalised world [monde mondialisé]. It is up to the people in question and to all others, including us, to ensure then that the oil, financial, and arms dealing game that installed and maintained this puppet (among many others) in power does not start over. It is the responsibility of the peoples, yes: and it is also of course to us, the peoples of Europe or America, that this is addressed.
It is a delicate task. But at stake is what we want to live and how we want to live it, with an acuteness that we are not accustomed to. That is what the Arab peoples are also signifying to us.
Article first appeared in French in Libération 28 March 2011. This translation by Gilbert Leung. Usual caveats apply.


[…] to presence, to be in the world is precisely to always create anew (see Nancy,most recently ‘What the Arab Peoples Signify to Us‘ or more extensively The Creation of the World). ShareRelated PostsAugust 27, 2010 — […]
[…] What the Arab peoples signify to us | Jean-Luc Nancy […]
[…] Libération: [ADDENDUM: I found an English translation here.] Les peuples arabes sont en train de nous signifier que la résistance et la révolte sont à […]
[…] just linked to Nancy’s 3/28 article on the Arab uprisings. Let me quote from the English translation: So, yes, it is necessary to keep a close eye on the strikes that are aimed at undermining the vile […]
[…] Nancy first appeared in French in Libération 28 March 2011. This translation by Gilbert Leung of Critical Legal Thinking. Many thanks to Gilbert for allowing us to republish it […]
For Alain Badiou’s response: http://www.criticallegalthinking.com/?p=2899
[…] following is Alain Badiou’s full reply Jean-Luc Nancy’s “What the Arab peoples signify to us“. With many thanks to Verso Books […]
[…] Jean-Luc Nancy’s view [ht: ke] is that the peoples of the West ahve the responsibility both of supporting military intervention in Libya and of making sure the rules of the old game are not reimposed. It is fine for the beautiful souls of the left and the sophisticated operators on the right to sigh or protest; whether in European or in Arab countries: one must know which world we are in. We are no longer just simply in the world of Western arrogance, self-confidence and imperialism. Oh! It is not that the poor old “West” has cleaned up its act: it is simply in the process of melting in the fusion that begets another world, without sunrise or sunset, a world where it is day and night everywhere at the same time and where it is necessary to reinvent the act of living together and, before all else, the act of living itself. […]
[…] ??? ??? ??????? ???: http://www.criticallegalthinking.com/?p=2793#more-2793 ?????????: ???????? […]
[…] – a withering sovereignty amidst a globalised economic, technological, and capitalist empire (as Jean-Luc Nancy and Jacques Derrida taught many times […]
[…] Alain Badiou’s open reply to Jean-Luc Nancy, he chides Nancy for falling into the trap that the NATO attacks on Libya were in any way designed […]
[…] March of this year Jean-Luc Nancy published an article entitled “What the Arab Peoples Signify to Us” in the Libération newspaper. The article supported the NATO lead military intervention in […]
[…] 2011By Alain BadiouThe following is Alain Badiou’s full reply to Jean-Luc Nancy’s “What the Arab peoples signify to us”. With many thanks to Verso Books […]
[…] 2011By Daniel MatthewsIn March of this year Jean-Luc Nancy published an article entitled “What the Arab Peoples Signify to Us” in the Libération newspaper. The article supported the NATO lead military […]
[…] Nancy, France, Libya and Me 5 April 2011By Donagh BrennanIn Alain Badiou’s open reply to Jean-Luc Nancy, he chides Nancy for falling into the trap that the NATO attacks on Libya were in any way […]