The True Blasphemy: Zizek on Pussy Riot

20 August 2012
By

Pussy Riot mem­bers accused of blas­phemy and hatred of reli­gion? The answer is easy: the true blas­phemy is the state accus­a­tion itself, for­mu­lat­ing as a crime of reli­gious hatred some­thing which was clearly a polit­ical act of protest against the rul­ing clique. Recall Brecht’s old quip from his Beg­gars’ Opera: “What is the rob­bing of a bank com­pared to the found­ing of a new bank?” In 2008, Wall Street gave us the new ver­sion: what is the steal­ing of a couple of thou­sand of dol­lars, for which one goes to prison, com­pared to fin­an­cial spec­u­la­tions that deprive tens of mil­lions of their homes and sav­ings, and are then rewar­ded by state help of sub­lime grandeur? Now, we got another ver­sion from Rus­sia, from the power of the state: What is a mod­est Pussy Riot obscene pro­voca­tion in a church com­pared to the accus­a­tion against Pussy Riot, this gigantic obscene pro­voca­tion of the state appar­atus which mocks any notion of decent law and order?

Was the act of Pussy Riot cyn­ical? There are two kinds of cyn­icism: the bit­ter cyn­icism of the oppressed which unmasks the hypo­crisy of those in power, and the cyn­icism of the oppress­ors them­selves who openly viol­ate their own pro­claimed prin­ciples. The cyn­icism of Pussy Riot is of the first kind, while the cyn­icism of those in power — why not call their author­it­arian bru­tal­ity a Prick Riot — is of the much more omin­ous second kind.

Back in 1905, Leon Trot­sky char­ac­ter­ized tsar­ist Rus­sia as “a vicious com­bin­a­tion of the Asian knout and the European stock mar­ket.” Does this des­ig­na­tion not hold more and more also for the Rus­sia of today? Does it not announce the rise of the new phase of cap­it­al­ism, cap­it­al­ism with Asian val­ues (which, of course, has noth­ing to do with Asia and everything to do with the anti-​democratic tend­en­cies in today’s global cap­it­al­ism). If we under­stand cyn­icism as ruth­less prag­mat­ism of power which secretly laughs at its own prin­ciples, then Pussy Riot are anti-​cynicism embod­ied. Their mes­sage is: IDEAS MATTER. They are con­cep­tual artists in the noblest sense of the word: artists who embody an Idea. This is why they wear balaclavas: masks of de-​individualization, of lib­er­at­ing anonym­ity. The mes­sage of their balaclavas is that it doesn’t mat­ter which of them got arres­ted — they’re not indi­vidu­als, they’re an Idea. And this is why they are such a threat: it is easy to imprison indi­vidu­als, but try to imprison an Idea!

The panic of those in power — dis­played by their ridicu­lously excess­ive bru­tal reac­tion — is thus fully jus­ti­fied. The more bru­tally they act, the more import­ant sym­bol Pussy Riot will become. Already now the res­ult of the oppress­ive meas­ures is that Pussy Riot are a house­hold name lit­er­ally all around the world.

It is the sac­red duty of all of us to pre­vent that the cour­ageous indi­vidu­als who com­pose Pussy Riot will not pay in their flesh the price for their becom­ing a global symbol.

—Sla­voj Žižek (Ori­gin­ally pub­lished on Dan­ger­ous Minds)

Tags:

3 Responses

  1. […] of those in power, and the cyn­icism of the oppress­ors them­selves who openly viol­ate […] Source RELATED NEWS­Nou­veau mor­ceau des Pussy riot, pour réveiller vos instincts de lutte#PussyRiotNYC […]

  2. zero on 31 August 2012 at 12:28 am

    Free Pussy Riot” writ­ten in blood at Rus­sian murder scene
    By Thomas Grove | Reu­ters – 2 hrs 25 mins ago
    Related Content

    Mem­bers of the female punk band “Pussy Riot” (R-​L) Nadezhda Tolokon­nikova, Yeka­ter­ina Samut­sevich and Maria Alyokh­ina sit in a glass-​walled cage after a court hear­ing in Moscow, August 17, 2012. REUTERS/​Maxim Shemet­ovEn­large Photo

    Mem­bers of the female punk band …

    MOSCOW (Reuters) — Two women were found stabbed to death in a Rus­sian apart­ment with the words “Free Pussy Riot” writ­ten on the wall in what was prob­ably blood, invest­ig­at­ors said on Thursday, stir­ring more pas­sion over the women jailed for a protest in a church.

    A Rus­sian Ortho­dox Church offi­cial said sup­port­ers of Pussy Riot now had “blood on their con­science”, the Inter­fax news agency reported.

    A law­yer for the women, who were sen­tenced to two years in prison this month for sta­ging a “punk prayer” against Vladi­mir Putin in Moscow’s main cathed­ral, said nobody in the band or con­nec­ted with it was involved in the crime.

    Nikolai Polo­zov, said the words scrawled on the wall may have been a “pro­voca­tion” aimed to dis­credit Pussy Riot.

    The bod­ies of a 76-​year-​old pen­sioner and her 38-​year-​old daugh­ter were found on Wed­nes­day in their apart­ment in the city of Kazan, the fed­eral Invest­ig­at­ive Com­mit­tee said in a state­ment. They died from knife wounds.

    BLOOD ON CONSCIENCE

    At the crime scene, on the wall of the apart­ment was dis­covered an inscrip­tion pre­sum­ably writ­ten in blood: ‘Free Pussy Riot’,” said the com­mit­tee, which is Russia’s top invest­ig­at­ive body and answers to Putin.

    Foot­age on state-​run Rossiya tele­vi­sion showed the words writ­ten in big red cap­ital let­ters on the kit­chen wall. There was no appar­ent con­nec­tion between the vic­tims and Pussy Riot.

    Five mem­bers of the group burst into Moscow’s Christ the Saviour cathed­ral in Feb­ru­ary and per­formed a “punk prayer” ask­ing the Vir­gin Mary to rid Rus­sia of Putin, who was then cam­paign­ing for elec­tion as pres­id­ent after four years as prime minister.

    The trial and sen­ten­cing of the act­iv­ists has drawn sharp cri­ti­cism from for­eign gov­ern­ments, musi­cians and rights groups, and was seen by Putin’s foes in Rus­sia as polit­ic­ally motiv­ated pun­ish­ment for dissent.

    The head of the church depart­ment for rela­tions with the armed forces and law enforce­ment agen­cies, Dimitry Smirnov, sug­ges­ted the crime might not have occurred if Pussy Riot had not received vocal sup­port from Rus­sian and West­ern crit­ics of their trial.

    This blood is on the con­science of so-​called com­munity that has sup­por­ted the par­ti­cipants in the act in Christ the Saviour cathed­ral, because as a res­ult people with unstable psyches have received carte-​blanche,” Inter­fax quoted Smirnov as saying.

    The Rus­sian Ortho­dox Church has cast the per­form­ance as a blas­phem­ous attack on the country’s main faith, and nation­al­ist pro-​church act­iv­ists have called for vigil­antes to pro­tect churches from desecration.

    MONSTROUS PROVOCATION

    Polo­zov, a law­yer for the jailed per­formers, said the crime was not con­nec­ted with Pussy Riot or its supporters.

    It’s hor­rible. In my view it is either a mon­strous pro­voca­tion or the act of a sick maniac. In any case it’s not con­nec­ted with Pussy Riot because Pussy Riot only sup­ports peace­ful and non-​violent protests,” he said.

    There have been many protests in sup­port of Pussy Riot and they’ve never been viol­ent,” said Polo­zov, who appealed the Pussy Riot con­vic­tions on Monday.

    A spokes­man for the regional Invest­ig­at­ive Com­mit­tee branch in Kazan, 800 km (500 miles) east of Moscow, said he did not believe a sup­porter of Pussy Riot was responsible.

    It was a reg­u­lar rob­bery, a reg­u­lar rob­bery and some degen­er­ate wrote that. It’s doubt­ful that some (Pussy Riot) sup­porter wrote that,” Andrei Shep­tit­sky said by telephone.

    Blog­gers sym­path­etic to Pussy Riot said it would be ridicu­lous to blame the crime on their supporters.

    Sup­port­ers of Pussy Riot are respons­ible for let­ting loose war in Syria,” Slavik Tsener wrote with appar­ent sar­casm on his Twit­ter microblog.

    Nadezhda Tolokon­nikova, Maria Alyokh­ina and Yeka­ter­ina Samut­sevich were con­victed of hoo­ligan­ism motiv­ated by reli­gious hatred on August 17.

    They said the per­form­ance, which came amidst a series of oppos­i­tion street protests that were the largest of Putin’s 12-​year rule, was meant as cri­ti­cism of Putin’s tightly con­trolled polit­ical sys­tem and the close ties between church and state in Rus­sia, which the con­sti­tu­tion says is a sec­u­lar country.

    A sur­vey released on Thursday by state-​controlled All-​Russian Pub­lic Opin­ion Research Cen­ter (VTsIOM) showed 33 per­cent of those asked found the two-​year sen­tences too harsh, while 31 per­cent said they were appropriate.

    Fif­teen per­cent said they were too leni­ent and 10 per­cent said the women should not have been tried at all, accord­ing to VTsIOM, which inter­viewed 1,600 people in 46 provinces.

    (Addi­tional report­ing by Maria Tsvetkova; Edit­ing by Steve Gut­ter­man and Andrew Roche)

  3. Illan on 2 September 2012 at 7:37 am

    The above story was a domestic dis­pute between a man (now charged) and one of the vic­tims. He admit­ted to leav­ing the ‘Free Pussy Riot’ note to try to throw the police off the scent: http://​www​.nytimes​.com/​2​0​1​2​/​0​9​/​0​1​/​w​o​r​l​d​/​e​u​r​o​p​e​/​p​u​s​s​y​-​r​i​o​t​-​m​u​r​d​e​r​-​a​-​d​o​m​e​s​t​i​c​-​d​i​s​p​u​t​e​.​h​tml

Leave a Reply