The Call for Papers is now live. Please read the full description of the streams here. If you would like to participate – send short abstract of your proposed paper to the stream organisers (as mentioned under their stream heading). Graduate students who seek a...
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in the For Women case last week, colleagues thought it would help to have a case summary for use in making sense of the judgment. Accordingly, I have produced a summary sticking precisely to the Court’s language from...
The word Mandate here refers to the arrangement by which the fate of the people in Palestine was handed to European colonial powers a century ago. A rereading of the Mandate at this time becomes a necessary act. Towards that, I distinguish between a Mandate 1.0 and a...
Every border implies the violence of its maintenance. It’s just that the border guards differ. Borders come in many kinds. The borders this statement brings to mind could be geographical, international. Perhaps they are otherwise spatial, or temporal. This is a...
As the bold “TED” logo dissolves into a flurry of red dots, a slightly nasal voice asks us to examine a picture and consider the puzzle it presents.[1] ‘These African students are doing their homework under streetlights at the airport in the capital city because...
In his book Freedom a Disease Without Cure, (2023), Slavoj Žižek draws a lengthy critique of my article “Many Worlds Interpretation, Critical Theory and the (Immanent) Paradox of Power.” The critique stands on a tripod (we will develop below). 1. Difference...
![Parody Alternative Judgment: For Women Scotland [2025]](https://i0.wp.com/criticallegalthinking.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/bri-tucker-wK5lmJ_tDoc-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1080%2C675&ssl=1)
